canadian Mar 20th, 2010 11:03AM
tna has been around 8 years and all they can get .8. tna r.i.p

Concered Wrestling Fanatic Mar 18th, 2010 08:03PM
Man please keep posting to a friendly atmosphere. Kids may be looking at this.

WWE SUX CRAP Mar 17th, 2010 11:03PM
too soon. of course wwe is whipping tna in ratings you dumb motherfucker. you expect a change overnight? wake up you fat lard ass go back to sucking on your fat mothers tits. it took WCW 2 years to beat WWE in ratings. think about that you dumb faggot cocksucker.

WWE = Ratings Mar 17th, 2010 09:03PM
WWE is whipping TNA in the ratings battle like a red headed step child. TNA should tuck their tail between their legs and go back to Thursday nights. P.S. Styles vs. Hardy was the lowest rated segment. ROTFLMAO. .74 Ouch!

WWE and THG BLOW ASS Mar 17th, 2010 09:03PM
wwe totally censored. no more chair shots, no nothing allowed. LMFAO ROFL wrestlers can't even fart in the ring or else they'll get fined and/or suspended. what kind of fucking wrestling is this shit??? LMFAO ROFL... TNA better take advantage of it. TNA RATED R for mayhem,violence,barbed wire bats,thumbtacks,blood,foul language,etc..... WWE RATED PG for kids under 12 yrs of age. LMFAO ROFL LMFAO

THG Mar 17th, 2010 08:03PM
Leave it to a Kool-Aid drinker to dismiss the ratings because they are an embarassment - but the moment they breach 1.3 they wave it around like a 12" erection. Look, brunswick, ratings do matter - as they show how many people watch, how many people buy the product, and what the current trend is. As much as you guys want to flaunt around WCW as a time when WWF/E could be challenged, remember one thing - WCW Lost. They lost because of the same crap Bischoff and company are pulling with TNA now. It's repeating previous mistakes and always trying to measure their dick against WWE rather than just concentrating on making their own product better. Did WCW compete and Beat WWF for a time? Yes - but neither side had a 3.0+ ratings deficit. Sorry lads, put the Kool-Aid down and step away from TNA-Town and back to reality.

Bethany Mar 17th, 2010 07:03PM
Gosh. People are so idiotic. It's more certain individuals who are moronic. Not necessarily either brand's fans as a whole. I think it's hilarious that some TNA fans complain about WWE bringing back former wrestlers to host, yet TNA's starting to look like WWE circa 1989, or there about. Meanwhile, WWE is aiming at the wrong audience. Kids are exposed to language and violence everyday, so surely a bit of wrestling won't hurt? I mean, if their parents are allowing them to watch it in the first place then what's the point in lowering the rating, losing the content and spoiling the fun for the rest of the audience? Both brands have their faults, but at the minute WWE is the wrestling giant and TNA is merely a dot to it.

The WWE Fan Killer Mar 17th, 2010 07:03PM
WWE fans are fucking morons

The TNA Fan Killer Mar 17th, 2010 06:03PM
TNA fans are morons

WWE BLOWS GOAT SHIT Mar 17th, 2010 06:03PM
wwe is totally censored now. not even chair shots are allowed. wwe is rated PG while TNA is rated R. everyone knows wrestling is like a soap-oprah (fake), but you expect to pretend its real while watching it. now tell me, how can anyone honestly believe wwe is real now that is been censored? you can't, bottomline. wwe is now totally for the elementary children, maybe some jr. high school kids, but thats it. TNA = more realistic wrestling (not censored), more mature (for all ages, more for adults though), rated R, foul language, blood, realistic storylines, better gimmicks, better everything. wwe just hit rock bottom with their PG rated crap. and for those lame wwe pepperoni face pimple kids who talk about ratings. first off TNA is NOT LIVE every monday, its LIVE everyother monday. this past week it was a recorded show, reason why ratings were'nt as good. everyone already knew who beat who and who wrestled who, the results were online days before it aired. plus it'll take time, it took WCW 2 years to beat WWE in ratings. think about. you can't really expect shit to change overnight. its all about time and hard-work. i say TNA IMPACT! goes LIVE every MONDAY, that would be much better.

brunswick Mar 17th, 2010 05:03PM
THG, ratings dont matter. People will watch Raw no matter how terrible it is.

THG Mar 17th, 2010 05:03PM
You forget Brett Hart. But you seem to shake your finger at WWE for bringing back 'old flames' meanwhile your 'superior product' TNA brings back Old Farts from the 1980's in an attempt to generate numbers. Guess What? WWE *STILL* drags in a 3.6+ Every Week, while TNA scored a 1.0 on it's 'glorious' move to Monday Nights. What did they do this week? 0.8. Zero - Point - Eight. All TNA is good for is keeping wrestlers warm for when they want the big paychecks again in WWE. Even then, they are so piss-poor sloppy they will STILL have to run through WWE's Minors for brushing up. TNA fanboys, they see a drop of rain and claim it's flooding.

Ok. Mar 17th, 2010 05:03PM
First Stone Cold and now the Rock. Trying to break back old flames to host to combat TNA's superior product. I gave up on WWE after the No chair shots to the head/no stunners from stone cold. Was stupid.

wwe rated PG Mar 17th, 2010 04:03PM
wwe can't do shit anymore. no more chair shots, no more NOTHING. wrestlers can't even cut a fart without getting fined. time to check out TNA for mayhem,blood,foul language, and real mature wrestling. leave wwe for the elementary children and possibly the jr. high kids.

who honestly cares? Mar 17th, 2010 04:03PM
fuck wwe. fuck the rock. TNA TNA TNA TNA TNA